Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 437 NE2D 486 - Hack v. State

Hack v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 1995
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 182 Ind. App. 156 - Roddy v. State · Richey v. State · Goodpaster v. State · Underhill v. State · Estep v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person who, not having a contractual interest in the property, knowingly or intentionally enters the premises without the owner's consent, commits Criminal Trespass, a Class A misdemeanor. If you find from the evidence that the State has failed to prove all the necessary elements, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the crime of Burglary, but find that Defendant was knowingly or intentionally on the premises of the Angle Inn without the consent of the business establish ment, you may find Defendant guilty of Criminal Trespass, an included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.