Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on White v. State · Ballard v. State · Page v. State · Gee v. State · Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant first contends that the trial court should have declared a mistrial following certain testimony given by Officer Thomas Stump of the Indiana State Police. Officer Stump testified to part of the chain of custody of the substance bought by the undercover officer. He began his testimony by describing his official duties. He then told the jury that he did not “personally know” defendant but had met him twice before. The state then asked him, without objection, to “briefly describe the circumstances of the two times that you’ve met [defendant].” Officer Stump answered: “The first time I believe was on December the 6th of last year, 1979. This would’ve been around 1:00 o’clock in the morning when we had our drug raid and picked up the defendants in the case. Uh, I was' assigned the team to go up to his residence and serve the warrant at that time. The second time was earlier this year when he was arrested again on another drug charge in Steuben County.” Defendant objected at this time and asked for an admonishment which was promptly given. After the witness had answered another unrelated question, defendant moved for a mistrial but this request was denied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there is no indication that the witness was called solely to wield an evidentiary harpoon,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rose v. Duckworth“the absence of any indication of a deliberate interjection of inadmissible evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rose v. Duckworth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.