Commonwealth v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth ex rel. Fisher v. Stitzel · 176 Pa. Super. 119 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. DiDio v. Baldi · Commonwealth ex rel. Bittner v. Price · Commonwealth ex rel. Gordy v. Lyons · 214 Pa. Super. 50 - Commonwealth v. Rose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rules 102 and 104 provide a clear and simple procedure [for the institution of criminal proceedings by written complaint]; until exceptions to those rules are adopted, they must be followed in all cases. "This also means that a preliminary arraignment must be held pursuant to Rule 116 and, if not waived, a preliminary hearing held pursuant to Rules 116(g), 117, 118, and 119.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“all proceedings shall be initiated by a written complaint,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.