Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 437 So. 2d 166 - State v. Jacobs

437 So. 2d 166 - State v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2021

21 state decisions

7019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Bridwell v. United States · Vasquez v. United States · United States v. Dzialak · United States v. Sumpter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"While the federal cases clearly provide more information regarding the likelihood that a criminal offense was being committed, the conclusion does not necessarily follow that the facts here are insufficient to establish probable cause. The fact that marijuana and cannabis seeds were found on two separate occasions within one month's time suggests a continuing violation of the drug laws and indicates a `fair probability' that marijuana or cannabis would be found in the house."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the `veracity' and `basis of knowledge' of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. And the duty of a reviewing court is simply to insure that the magistrate had a `substantial basis for ... conclud[ing] that probable cause existed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.