437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
184 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 186 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State (1991), 697 So. 2d 777 - Coleman v. State (1997)
184 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 422 So. 2d 749 - Dunaway v. WH Hopper & Associates, Inc. · United States v. Deutsch · 420 So. 2d 1055 - Young v. State · 426 So. 2d 405 - Jackson v. State · 415 So. 2d 689 - Turner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 186 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If during the course of trial, the prosecution attempts to introduce evidence which has not been timely disclosed to the defense as required by these rules, and the defense objects to the introduction for that reason, the court shall act as follows: 1. Grant the defense a reasonable opportunity to interview the newly discovered witness, to examine the newly produced documents, photographs or other evidence; and 2. If, after such opportunity, the defense claims unfair surprise or undue prejudice and seeks a continuance or mistrial, the court shall, in the interest of justice and absent unusual circumstances, exclude the evidence or grant a continuance for a period of time reasonably necessary for the defense to meet the non-disclosed evidence or grant a mistrial. 3. The court shall not be required to grant either a continuance or mistrial for such a discovery violation if the prosecution withdraws its efforts to introduce such evidence.”
27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tucker v. State · Brewer v. State“A rule which is not enforced is no rule.”
25 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brooks v. State · Harris v. State“1. Names and addresses of all witnesses in chief proposed to be offered by the prosecution at trial, together with a copy of the contents of any statement, written, recorded or otherwise preserved of each such witness and the substance of any oral statement made by any such witness; 2. Copy of any written or recorded statement of the defendant and the substance of any oral statement made by the defendant; 3. Copy of the criminal record of the defendant, if proposed to be used to impeach; 4. Any reports, statements, or opinions of experts, written, recorded or otherwise preserved, made in connection with the particular case and the substance of any oral statement made by any such expert; 5. Any physical evidence and photographs relevant to the case or which may be offered in evidence; and 6. Any exculpatory material concerning the defendant.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tucker v. State · Granger v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.