Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 437 SO2D 198 - Bayshore v. State

Bayshore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 397 So. 2d 775 - Nationwide Mut. Ins. v. Ed Soules Const. Co. · 336 So. 2d 586 - Filmon v. State · Jenkins v. State · 413 So. 2d 1283 - Kindell v. State · Jacobs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether or not the court can see from the record that the conduct of the prosecuting attorney did not prejudice the accused, and unless this conclusion be reached, the judgment should be reversed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]f [Bayshore] was at home with his father as he told [the officer], where's the one person who can corroborate that?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.