Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 437 SO2D 269 - State v. Husband

State v. Husband’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

99 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably State v. Dotie (2009), 870 So. 2d 995 - State v. Johnson (2004)

99 state decisions

3801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Terry v. Ohio · Chimel v. California · Chambers v. Maroney · Texas v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Armed robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another from the person of another or that is in the immediate control of another, by use of force or intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon. B. Whoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years and for not more than ninety-nine years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “A. It is unlawful for any person who has been convicted of ... any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Law [LSA-R.S. 40:961 et seq.] which is a felony or any crime defined as an attempt to commit one of the above enumerated offenses under the laws of this state ... to possess a firearm or carry a concealed weapon.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “A. It is unlawful for any person who has been convicted of ... simple burglary ... [or] burglary of an inhabited dwelling to possess a firearm or carry a concealed weapon. ... D. For the purposes of this Section, "firearm" means any pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun, submachine gun, black powder weapon, or assault rifle which is designed to fire or is capable of firing fixed cartridge ammunition or from which a shot or projectile is discharged by an explosive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.