Hubbard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State (1987), 650 So. 2d 1289 - MacK v. State (1994)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 419 So. 2d 563 - Smith v. State · 413 So. 2d 1007 - Edwards v. State · Calicoat v. State · Adams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where there is no claim of oversight and no reason stated why the matter was not inquired into on”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“re-cross examination is not allowable as a matter of right, but a matter of trial court discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[I]n laying the predicate to introduce prior inconsistent statements of a witness, the questions should include whether or not on a specific date, at a specific place, and in the presence of specific persons, the witness made a particular statement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.