Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 437 SO2D 634 - Thompkins v. State

Thompkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · 407 So. 2d 865 - McCallum v. State · 389 So. 2d 961 - Watson v. State · 421 So. 2d 1344 - Byrd v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no showing that this was a case of deliberate prosecutorial delay. 'Negligence on the part of the State must be weighed less heavily than deliberate prosecutorial delay.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The length of delay must be 'presumptively prejudicial' in order to trigger an inquiry into the remaining Barker factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.