Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 A2D 901 - Pratt v. Freese's, Inc.

Pratt v. Freese's, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2018

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

1201981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Winkle · Hersum v. Kennebec Water District · Ginn v. Penobscot Company · Banville v. Huckins · Emerson v. Ham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]imply because the accident had in fact occurred”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The doctrine of res ipsa loquitor is applicable where (i) there has been an unexplained accident, (ii) the instrument that caused the injury was under the management or control of the defendant and (iii) in the ordinary course of events, the accident would not have happened absent negligence on the part of the defendant. If the plaintiff is able to produce evidence establishing each element of the doctrine, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant who must demonstrate the absence of negligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]laintiffs introduced no evidence to show that at the time of the accident a defect in the elevator existed which either defendant could have remedied by using due care”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.