In Re Mims’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 522
Relies on Butner v. United States · Johnson v. Home State Bank · Segal v. Rochelle · Kokoszka v. Belford · Morton v. National Bank of New York City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Note was physically delivered or assigned pursuant to a written agreement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Garcia · In re Benyamin“right to payment, whether or not such right is ... disputed, [or] undisputed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.