United States v. Charpentier’s Empirical Analysis
438 F.2d 721 · 1971
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1997
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Haynes v. Washington · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners · George v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Accused cannot be convicted of crime based upon his own uncorroborated confession or admission, and some measure of independent evidence is essential.” (headnote ¶2.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Nichols“extrinsic evidence must establish the commission of the crime by somebody, or in other words, that the crime has in fact been committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.