Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

438 F.3d 1225

Docket No. 04-2072.

Rivera v. Pennsylvania

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2006.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2006-03-07

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2017

10 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jeremy A. Mercer, Kirkpatrick & Lock-hart Nicholson Graham, Pittsburgh, PA, for Appellant.

¶2David J. Mussel, Office of District Attorney, Allentown, PA, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et. al.

¶3Before BARRY, AMBRO and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

¶5ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

¶6It appearing that the Petition for Panel Rehearing filed by Appellant having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, and that Appellant has now raised a question not contained in his brief that we may nevertheless consider because it relates to jurisdiction, to-wit, a suggestion that the District Court violated Rule 58’s requirement that every judgment should be entered on a separate document, it is ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing is hereby GRANTED and that the opinion heretofore filed is hereby VACATED, and the Clerk DIRECTED to set up a briefing schedule for the parties limited to the Rule 58 issue only for consideration at a date to be determined by the panel.

/438/f3d/1225 · .json · Public domain