Rolling v. Crosby’s Empirical Analysis
438 F.3d 1296 · 2006
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Waters v. Thomas · Zaidi v. Northern Virginia Hospital Corp. · Rolling v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.