Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 F.3d 320 - Dotzel v. Ashbridge

Dotzel v. Ashbridge’s Empirical Analysis

438 F.3d 320 · 2006

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably No. 05-2361 (2007), Churchill v. University of Colorado at Boulder (2012)

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

190200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Kentucky v. Graham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, does a Board Member, like a judge, perform a traditional "adjudicatory” function, in that he decides facts, applies law, and otherwise resolves disputes on the merits (free from direct political influence)? Second, does a Board member, like a judge, decide cases sufficiently controversial that in the absence of absolute immunity, he would be subject to numerous damages actions? Third, does a Board member, like a judge, adjudicate disputes against a backdrop of multiple safeguards designed to protect [the parties’] constitutional rights?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “among the most fractious issues faced by municipalities, and the risk of threats and harassment is great,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “legal and structural components of the job function,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.