Curlott v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 5941
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Udall v. Tallman · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Arnett v. Kennedy · United States v. Larionoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) The Office of Personnel Management shall ... in designating places under section 205(a) hereof, consider the relative consumer price levels in the area and in the District of Columbia, and give due consideration to the differences in goods and services available and to the manner of living of persons employed in the areas concerned in positions comparable to those of the United States employees in the areas ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(2) in fixing the Territorial cost-of-living allowance . . . make appropriate deductions when quarters or subsistence, commissary or other purchasing privileges are furnished at a cost substantially lower than the prevailing local cost.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.