Stiner v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1397 (§ 2001 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1397A (§ 2002 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. . . operate to directly displace the States' freedom to structure integral operations in areas of traditional governmental functions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“); King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 , 333 n.34, 88 S.Ct. 2128, 20 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1968) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.