¶1concurring.
¶2I concur for the reasons set forth in Nalls v. State and Melvin v. State, 437 Md. 674, 89 A.3d 1126, 2014 WL 1613399 (2014).
438 Md. 1
Szwed v. State
Decided April 23, 2014
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 2014-04-23
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Nalls & Melvin v. State (2014), Scott v. State (2014)
36 state decisions
Relies on Nalls & Melvin v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2014-04-23
View the full empirical analysis of this case →