Posey County v. Chamness’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2005
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ashton v. Anderson · Reid v. State · New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Henderson · Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Wood · 145 Ind. App. 159 - Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Otis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a trial judge conducts a separate interrogation of a witness so that such could be error, such error is deemed waived unless an objection is interposed by the complaining party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“should consider the nature of the issue and the offered opinion in light of all attendant cireumstances of the particular case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Faulkner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.