Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 N.W.2d 101 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

155
cited by 155 later decisions
6
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

1 district · 154 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 155 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Smith (1992), State v. Hogan (1996)

1 district · 154 state decisions

5901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Batson v. Kentucky · Franks v. Delaware · Bank of Nova Scotia v. United States · United States v. Forbes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 155 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the jury believed the state's witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A search warrant is void, and the fruits of the search must be excluded, if the application includes intentional or reckless misrepresentations of fact mate rial to the findings of probable cause. A misrepresentation is “material” if when set aside there is no longer probable cause to issue the search warrant. If so, then the court must determine that the police deliberately or recklessly misrepresented facts, because innocent or negligent misrepresentations will not invalidate a warrant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “lesser burden of establishing a basis for inquiry by the court in an in camera hearing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.