Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 N.W.2d 670 - State v. Crisler

State v. Crisler’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2011

7 state decisions

501989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Elstad · Michigan v. Tucker · California v. Prysock · Allen v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Q: Okay. And before we get started, Hector, I’m going to read you what is called the Miranda warning. Okay? (Pause) You have the right to remain silent. (Pause) Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. (Pause) You have the right to talk to a lawyer now and have a lawyer present now or at any time during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you without cost. (Pause) Do you understand each of these rights that I have explained to you? A: Yes Q: Okay. (Pause) And having these rights in mind, will you talk to me? (Pause) A: Yes, but I have just one question. So if I ask for a lawyer now, will there be a lawyer present now? Q: If you ask for a lawyer right now, (Pause) we’ll stop the interview. We won’t talk to you anymore until a lawyer can represent you but chances are you won’t be able to talk to a lawyer until tomorrow. (Pause) And so we wouldn’t, we wouldn’t talk to you anymore until then. (Pause) So that, that’s up to you. If you want to, if you want an attorney (Pause) then, then we have to stop right here. (Pause) A: Okay. Q: So you have to (Pause) make that decision (Pause) on whether you want to talk to me or, or you don’t. A: I’ll talk to you.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the suspect has the right to remain silent; (2) any statements made can and will be used against the suspect in a court of law; (3) the suspect has the right to talk to an attorney before being questioned and to have the attorney present during questioning by police; and (4) if unable to afford to hire an attorney, one will be appointed at no cost before any questioning if so desired.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.