Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 P2D 228 - Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Risher v. State (1974), Lewis v. State (1970)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

1401968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Von Moltke v. Gillies · Betts v. Brady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to * * * have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We think the term ‘effective assistance’ —the courts’ construction of the constitutional requirement for the assistance of counsel — does not relate to the quality of the service rendered by a trial lawyer or to the decisions he makes in the normal course of a criminal case; except that, if his conduct is so incompetent as to deprive his client of a trial in any real sense — render the trial a mockery and a farce is one descriptive expression, — the. accused must have another trial, or rather, more accurately, is still entitled to a trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Closely allied to appellant's claim that a continuance should have been granted because appellant's counsel did not have time to adequately prepare for trial is appellant's further claim that he was denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel guaranteed to him by the sixth amendment to the federal constitution. 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.