Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 SO2D 358 - Justus v. State

Justus v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019 · most notably Justus v. Florida (1984), 524 So. 2d 403 - Torres-Arboledo v. State (1988)

52 state decisions

2201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Payton v. New York · United States v. Rabinowitz · United States v. Watson · Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “(l)(a) The term “kidnapping” means forcibly, secretly, or by threat confining, abducting, or imprisoning another person against her or his will and without lawful authority, with intent to: 1. Hold for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage. 2. Commit or facilitate commission of any felony. 3. Inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize the victim or another person. 4. Interfere with the performance of any governmental or political function.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “In deciding whether there was probable cause for the arrest, the trial court was authorized to consider all of the collective knowledge and information of all of the officers involved in the investigation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.