Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

438 So. 2d 410

Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 6, 1983

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1983-09-06

Relies on Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1 · Sireci v. Florida · 399 So. 2d 964 - Sireci v. State

Decided 1983-09-06

PER CURIAM.

¶1The defendant James William Mead appeals his conviction for first degree murder entered below. His sole point on appeal is that the state failed to adduce sufficient evidence at trial to establish the essential element of premeditation herein. We reject this contention upon a holding that the defendant’s statement to the police, which was admitted in evidence below, adequately established the above-stated element of premeditation in this case. Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964, 967 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982).

¶2Affirmed.

/438/so2d/410 · .json · Public domain