¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress upon a holding that the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient for the trial court to conclude that the defendant possessed a sufficient knowledge of the English language to give a valid consent.
¶2We have considered the other issues raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. See State v. Millwood, 430 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Login v. State, 394 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
¶3Affirmed.