Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 SW2D 271 - State v. Vonderau

State v. Vonderau’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1994

8 state decisions

601969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Harris · State v. Kesterson · State v. Temple · State v. Frankum · State v. Siegel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘In charging a felony, therefore, whether made so by a direct statute or by classification on account of the punishment prescribed, the use of the word “feloniously” is necessary, for the very sufficient reason that its use informs the accused of the nature or grade of crime he is alleged to have committed. * * * > ” (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Patrolman James Connor, a member of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.