Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 S.W.2d 441 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 85 Ill. 2d 281 - People of Illinois v. Myers (1981), State v. Cooper (1977)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

110196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Davis · State v. Harrington · State v. Wright · State v. Block · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A]n attempt is an intent to do a particular criminal thing, with ■ an act towards it falling short of the thing intended. * * * The defendant must have taken steps going beyond mere preparation, by doing something bringing him nearer the crime he intends to commit. * * * The act need not, however, be the ultimate step toward, or the last proximate, or the last possible, act to the consummation of the crime attempted to be perpetrated. * * * ” State v. Thomas, 438 S.W.2d 441, 446 (Mo.1969).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The original information did not state an offense because the supporting statute had been repealed. Filing the original information under a repealed statute was the same as if nothing in the nature of a complaint had been filed. That is to say, there was nothing before the court until the so-called amended information was filed; the first and only valid information sufficient to charge the commission of an offense was [the “amended” information.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.