Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 SW2D 583 - Valle v. State

Valle v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 1988
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1988

10 state decisions

70196919701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barr v. State · Baylor v. State · Rodriguez v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 629 - Muckleroy v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 629 - Flores v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The intention to commit an offense is presumed whenever the means used is such as would ordinarily result in the commission of the forbidden act.” Compare with V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Sec. 2.05.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.