Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 438 SW2D 8 - State v. Ross

State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1972
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina · United Steelworkers v. United States · Nelson v. County of Los Angeles · State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The facts as found by the trial court compel a finding of proprietary interest or standing in Charles Ross which call for application of the rule of Jones v. United States, supra; and, since the evidence seized, the check protector and other checks similar to the uttered check, was damaging evidence on the issue of his knowledge that the uttered check was a forgery, its admission at trial was not harmless error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JRM
  2. “Appellant's standing to object under the circumstances of this case was established in Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re JRM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.