Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 A2D 912 - State v. Upham

State v. Upham’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2011

14 state decisions

601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fortes · State v. Giorgi · State v. Upham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we expect nothing less than good behavior as a minimum from inmates of our correctional institutions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]uch a fact is entirely irrelevant to a reexamination of the reasons for the imposition of sentence in the first place”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.