Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 F.2d 1253 - Broadway v. Culpepper

Broadway v. Culpepper’s Empirical Analysis

439 F.2d 1253 · 1971

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
February 2008
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably United States v. Fernandez (1973), Foster v. Sparks (1975)

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1801971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1863 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000H

Relies on Swain v. State of Alabama · Cree v. Goldstein · Turner v. Fouche · Corallo v. United States · Carter v. Jury Commission of Greene County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in injunctive cases the Court may exact from officials responsible for the construction of jury lists a high standard of comparability between demographic percentages and those of the jury list.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A list — this constitutes the “universe”— which is only 60% useable is hardly a source reflecting the community from which a fair cross-section may be obtained unless there is proof — lacking here — that the composition of the 40% remnant is comparable to the 60% available.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Normally, corrective action (should) take the form, not of picking out supplemental sources, but of eradicating the error in the primary source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.