Battle v. Mulholland’s Empirical Analysis
439 F.2d 321 · 1971
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Porter v. Califano (1979), Flanagan v. Munger (1989)
27 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Terminiello v. Chicago · McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 Cahokia · Wieman v. Updegraff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is recognized that the state as an employer has an interest in regulating the conduct of its employees in ways which may be more restrictive than those which can be applied to citizens who are not employees. Pickering v. Board of Education, 1968, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 ; Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969, 393 U.S. 503, 506, 507 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 . The problem is to balance the rights of the employees as citizens against the interest of the state in promoting efficient public service. Pred v. Board of Public Instruction, (5 Cir. 1969) 415 F.2d 851 , 857.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“type of restrictive response, based on theoretical reactions by others”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is now settled law that if the state, either by statute, regulation or procedure, creates in its employees the expectation of re-employment or retention, then their employment can only be terminated under procedures which accord them the fundamentals of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bean v. Darr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.