Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

439 F.2d 721

Docket No. 24525.

Andrews v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1971.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1971-04-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1971

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Gault

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1971-04-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stanley George Andrews, in pro per.

¶2Sherman F. Furey, U. S. Atty., Jay F. Bates, Asst. U. S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for appellee.

¶3Before CHAMBERS and HAMLEY, Circuit Judges, and GOODWIN,* District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6We find here, because of facts alleged and not within the record, that Andrews should have an evidentiary hearing on representations allegedly made to him about what the sentence would be, and it is so ordered.

/439/f2d/721 · .json · Public domain