Roles v. Maddox’s Empirical Analysis
439 F.3d 1016 · 2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Moskal v. United States · Ross v. County of Bernalillo · Napoleon Hartsfield v. Pete Vidor, Deputy, Sued in His Individual and Official Capacity
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Beyond doubt, Congress enacted § 1997e(a) to reduce the quantity and improve the quality of prisoner suits; to this purpose, Congress afforded corrections officials time and opportunity to address complaints internally before allowing the initiation of a federal case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Soto v. Sweetman“The congressional purpose in enacting § 1997e(a) [ is] rooted in conservation of judicial resources through alternative dispute resolution ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Soto v. Sweetman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.