Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 F.3d 446 - United States v. Rivera

United States v. Rivera’s Empirical Analysis

439 F.3d 446 · 2006

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
June 2013
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553

Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Haack · United States v. Dalton · United States v. Pizano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the district court should determine the Guidelines sentencing range. Second, the district court should determine whether any traditional departures are appropriate. Third, the district court should apply all other section 3553(a) factors in determining whether to impose a Guidelines or non-Guidelines sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “At a minimum the court should indicate which arguments are being adopted, state why they are relevant, and offer some explanation as to how the adopted factors affect the sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Well, I think the mandatory minimum is sufficient penalty under the circumstances that have been placed here in the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.