Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 F.3d 565 - United States v. Bear

United States v. Bear’s Empirical Analysis

439 F.3d 565 · 2006

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on United States v. Olano · Johnson v. United States · Braxton v. United States · United States v. Mason · United States v. Montgomery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An error is plain if it is ‘clear’ or ‘obvious’ under current law.” (citation omitted)). . In his reply brief, Defoor suggests that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury that, in order to convict Defoor of aiding and abetting a § 287 violation, it had to find that he knew that what he was doing was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.