United States v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
439 F.3d 855 · 2006
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably United States v. Lucido (2010), United States v. Coloian (2007)
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 986 · 12 U.S.C. § 1829 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3401 · 18 U.S.C. § 3607 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 534 (National Law)
Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Thomas v. Arn · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n light of the Supreme Court's instruction narrowing the scope of ancillary jurisdiction in Kokkonen ..., we are convinced that a district court does not have ancillary jurisdiction to expunge a criminal record based solely on equitable grounds”); United States v. Dunegan, 251 F.3d 477 , 479-80 (3d Cir. 2001) (citing Kokkonen for the proposition that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“5 Id. 13 In view of the Supreme Court's instruction on the purposes of ancillary jurisdiction, we must determine whether Coloian's request for the expungement of his criminal record, based solely on equitable grounds, 6 serves either of these purposes. 14 The Third, Eighth and Ninth Circuits have read Kokkonen to preclude ancillary jurisdiction over orders to expunge criminal records based solely on equitable grounds. These circuits have rejected the notion that a federal court's jurisdiction under either § 3231 or its”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the absence of any applicable statute enacted by Congress, or an allegation that the criminal proceedings were invalid or illegal, a District Court does not have the jurisdiction to expunge a criminal record, even when ending in an acquittal”); United States v. Sumner, 226 F.3d 1005 , 1015 (9th Cir. 2000) (relying on Kokkonen to hold”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. United States
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.