National American Insurance v. W & G, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
439 F.3d 943 · 2006
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2025
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Borho · Turpin v. Standard Reliance Insurance Co.(Mutual) · Rodgers v. City of Des Moines · St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Lexington Insurance · Dowdle v. National Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, considering the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issues of material fact exist and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In insurance coverage actions involving diversity of citizenship, state law controls our analysis of the insurance policy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.