Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

439 F. App'x 658

Barrera Morales v. Holder

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2011

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-06-24

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales · Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey

Decided 2011-06-24

¶1 MEMORANDUM …

¶2 Narcisco Barrera Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

¶3 We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Morales failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S. citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979 (9th Cir.2009).

¶4 Morales’s contention that the IJ did not properly consider and weigh all evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005).

¶5 PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

…

¶6 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/439/fappx/658 · .json · Public domain