Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 FSUPP 1233 - Steinberg v. Carey

Steinberg v. Carey’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
February 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1992

2 federal appellate ·

40197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Coates v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining was [sic] constitutes ‘willful or reckless disregard for the truth’ the inquiry normally will be to determine whether the defendants knew the material facts misstated or omitted, or failed or refused, after being put on notice of a possible material failure of disclosure, to apprise themselves of the facts where they could have done so without any extraordinary effort. Chris Craft Indus., Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 480 F.2d 341, 363-364, 396-399 (2d Cir. 1973). The answer to the inquiry will of course depend upon the circumstances of the particular case, including the nature and duties of the corporate positions held by the defendants.” 479 F.2d at 1306 n. 98.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.