Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 FSUPP 505 - Kanteles v. Wheelock

Kanteles v. Wheelock’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1981
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Goldberg v. Kelly · Gault · Fay v. Noia · Paul v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the grand jury’s determination of insanity certified to the Superior Court which is both the first step in the process which ultimately leads to committal and the last step at which any evidence on the underlying alleged incident is considered. . . . Once the grand jury finds him insane, the petitioner stands to suffer loss of liberty and the stigma of criminal commitment without being convicted of a crime. It is, therefore, at this stage where due process safeguards should attach. Kanteles v. Wheelock, 439 F. Supp. at 510 (footnote omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.