Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 FSUPP 606 - Cayce v. Adams

Cayce v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
May 2015
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2015

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

4019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 255 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There was a knowing failure to pursue a classification investigation designed to put male and female employees doing “equal work” on an equal footing consistent with classification standards. The differential was sex-based as a matter of law and fact. Thus the classification system, as applied, was not bona fide. In this instance neither the classifiers nor [the supervisor] were shown to have had any bias against females. Nonetheless the discrepancy was knowingly permitted. Since it differentiated between a lower paid woman and a higher paid man doing “equal work” and was shown to be sex based, recovery under the Equal Pay Act must be granted—”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... however ‘bona fide’ the Civil Service Classification system appears on paper, if it is not applied in a sex-blind manner, differences are not entitled to exemption from the operation of the Equal Pay Act. A classification system reflecting differ- enees based on sex, whether as drafted or as applied, cannot be bona fide.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.