Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 Mass. 134 - In re Bailey

In re Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington · United States v. Monsanto · In re Disbarment of Passman · New Jersey v. New York · Baez v. Breslin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “trust” was not used in arranging the stock transfer and that the Internal Revenue Service has since characterized the stock as "income” on the date of the transfer which, Bailey argues, is inconsistent with a finding that the stock was held in trust. 4 .Bailey's argument that he owned the appreciated value of the stock is also inconsistent with his actual dealings with the stock. Bai ley acknowledges that, in the initial months after he received the stock, its value did not increase. "If the understanding had been that any appreciation in value was Bailey's own money, that would mean that Bailey could not withdraw any proceeds for himself until at least such time as some appreciation occurred.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “I could have at this point rejected the silly conditions offered by [co-counsel] and applied for a healthy fee to [the court] and turned the balance of the Biochem stock back to the Government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “would be paid with [the court's] approval only that amount which is commensurate with the result achieved in your case, and the amount of the work that went into it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.