Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 NE2D 1385 - Fox v. State

Fox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lindsey v. State · Margoles v. United States · Gardner v. State · United States v. Vasquez · United States v. Accardo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at a minimum it must, at that time, interrogate the jury to determine its exposure, and that jurors acknowledging exposure should be examined individually to determine the extent of such exposure and the likelihood of prejudice resulting therefrom”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “jumped into the car and took off' Several minutes later the victims saw a South Bend police car, stopped it, and reported the incident. A short time later Fox was identified and arrested. The weapon was never located.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Finally, Fox argues that the court erred at sentencing in considering a 1977 conviction for prostitution. In part she argues that the conviction should not be deemed a felony. It was, and her brief so concedes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.