Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 NE2D 204 - Meredith v. State

Meredith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 2002

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

60198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Wilson v. State · 165 Ind. App. 369 - Winston v. State · Nelson v. State · Young v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Inasmuch as this fundamental error is apparent on the face of the record, we are compelled to reverse [the defendant's] convictions sua sponte, although the issues he raises on appeal did not involve this error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “conviction of an offense where evidence and reasonable inferences of a material element of the offense are totally lacking [constitutes fundamental error].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Lest there remain any doubt about the constitutional stature of the reasonable-doubt standard, we explicitly hold that the Due Process Clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.