Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 439 PA 140 - Snoparsky v. BAER

Snoparsky v. BAER’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
4
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Incollingo v. EWING (1971), Skipworth v. Lead Industries Ass'n, Inc. (1997)

9 federal appellate · 58 state decisions

36019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 33 Cal. 2d 80 - Summers v. Tice · Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Delhi-Warnock Building Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where the conduct of two or more actors is tortious, and it is proved that harm has been caused to the plaintiff by only one of them, but there is uncertainty as to which one has caused it, the burden is upon each such actor to prove that he has not caused the harm.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(a) In any action the defendant or any additional defendant may, as the joining party, join as an additional defendant any person whether or not a party to the action who may be alone liable or liable over to him on the cause of action declared upon by the plaintiff or jointly or severally liable thereon with him, or who may be liable to the joining party on any cause of action which he may have against the joined party arising out of the transaction or occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences upon which the plaintiff’s cause of action is based.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.