439 So. 2d 1336 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 398 So. 2d 369 - Stewart v. State · 398 So. 2d 376 - Green v. State · 369 So. 2d 318 - Grace v. State · Thomas v. State · 375 So. 2d 1285 - Oates v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general rule of law, a juror is subject to challenge for cause, although not related to the accused, if he is related to a party in custody and awaiting trial for participating in the same offense. Thomas v. State, 133 Ala. 139 , [144,] 32 So. 250 [, 251] (1902) [veniremember second cousin to wife of codefendant].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Constitutional questions are not before this court unless raised in some manner in the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.