439 So. 2d 193 - Cooley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “' "In determining the constitutional adequacy of pretrial identification, the central question is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, the identification was reliable.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 659 So. 2d 995 - Dunning v. State · 485 So. 2d 799 - Allison v. State

2. “the mere fact that the appellant was subjected to a one-man show-up does not necessarily render that identification procedure impermissively suggestive.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 516 So. 2d 889 - Hutchinson v. State · 482 So. 2d 1341 - O'DELL v. State

3. “"`[T]he police action in returning the suspect to the vicinity of the crime for immediate identification in circumstances such as these fosters the desirable objectives of fresh, accurate identification which in some instances may lead to the immediate release of an innocent suspect and at the same time enable the police to resume the search for the fleeing culprit while the trail is fresh." Id. at 280 , quoting Bates v. United States , 405 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Cir. 1968).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 482 So. 2d 1341 - O'DELL v. State