Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on 396 So. 2d 1107 - Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n · 327 So. 2d 18 - State v. Jones · Williamson v. United States · Wesley v. State · 398 So. 2d 1005 - Bruner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant has been given a split sentence probation contrary to the case of Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1981) and when same is corrected upon the defendant's application, is it required that such defendant be present at the time the order is corrected?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall vacate and set the judgment aside and shall discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant him a new trial or correct the sentence as may appear appropriate. A court may entertain and determine such motion without requiring the production of the prisoner at the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“entitled to be present at the time of such correction in the same manner and to the same degree as ... when initially sentenced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.