¶1We reverse appellant’s conviction of burglary because it appears without contradiction that appellant was invited to enter and remain in the structure in question by the complaining witness. See Section 810.02(1), Florida Statutes (1979) and State v. Hicks, 421 So.2d 510 (Fla.1982). The remaining judgments and sentences' are affirmed.
¶2Affirmed in part and reversed in part.